Time to discuss: Windows 95
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:25 pm
Based on the time of the release, obviously we wouldnt compare a 10 year old operating system to something today. I have heard time and time again "windows sucks"
Was Windows 95 that bad of an operating sytem of its time?
My experience, no. Not the most stable, but I can't say I have had bad experiences using that operating system on a typical system for it [meaning a 75 Mhz Pentium with 24 MB memory with a 850 MB drive and a 4x CD-ROM]. That doesn't mean there werent issues. There were issues on just the hardware, like the CD-ROM wouldn't read a disk that had more than one session, or CD-RW.
How do you compare this GUI with another, like Warp OS/2, or Mac OS of the time era?
Was Windows 95 that bad of an operating sytem of its time?
My experience, no. Not the most stable, but I can't say I have had bad experiences using that operating system on a typical system for it [meaning a 75 Mhz Pentium with 24 MB memory with a 850 MB drive and a 4x CD-ROM]. That doesn't mean there werent issues. There were issues on just the hardware, like the CD-ROM wouldn't read a disk that had more than one session, or CD-RW.
How do you compare this GUI with another, like Warp OS/2, or Mac OS of the time era?