2 questions about MX moni

Discuss the world of file sharing, from philosophy to help with applications.

Moderator: CricketMX Forum Moderators

Post Reply
webSeeker10
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:05 pm

Hi,
I have 2 questions :
1) i want to know if it is possible to fit moni, such a way that anybody who have not moni running is kicked out of my Q.
2) it seems to me that moni is hackable : sometimes, moni stops running, with always the same chain appearing in the log list :
“]‘—‘‹Â
Protoman X
A Forum Addict
A Forum Addict
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

In reguards to number 1, not possible. MXMoni can't tell anything that doesn't show in the whois dialog. You *could* set it to autostart people with MXM, Moni, or the like and setting it to kick people who have numbers in their name, but most people using MXM don't advertise that they use it in their usernames. SO it'd kind of defeat the purpose. Plus I don't know if it would "confuse" MXMoni to try that, since I don't use it.

As for #2... It's not a hack but an error message.
error message wrote:Transfer window has disappeared.
Mxjack.dll is being removed.
Stop Monitoring
Apparently whoever translated MXMoni forgot to translate that error is all it is.
webSeeker10
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:05 pm

Tx a lot for this infos.
Too bad that Moni is not abble to filter moni users...
This soft does many things with WinMX, aand the features seem really to access to basic level of winMX, so, perhaps a future version of moni (i don't want to talk about a release 4.0 of WinMX :lol: :lol: ) could integrate this one :?: :?:
Protoman X
A Forum Addict
A Forum Addict
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

I don't think that's very likey as MXMoni hasn't been updated in ages, and either way MXMoni doesn't actually send out any data. The only way it would really be possible would be for MXMoni to force the user to have a tag in their name. I doubt that many people would be to happy about that.

Look at the number of people who've removed [RCMS] from the topic of RCMS channels for example. It'd just be a repeat of that... which would make it rather pointless
Post Reply