pro is better than home
i am using home @ the moment untill the format again
What Operating System Do You Like Best?
Moderator: CricketMX Forum Moderators
- Freezmizer
- Know-It-All
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 8:54 am
Better in what ways? More features, easier to use? Be specific.
-- Ha Ha Charade you are....... --
- Boozybaz
- Alcoholic
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 2:41 pm
- Location: Staffordshire, England
- Contact:
well obviously cuz its a pro version and not home there is gonna be more/different options but 2 be honest i have only had it on a few days and i aint looked through the options really but as i do and as i spot things different from pro i will let you know
i gave you the XP pro no activation ISO why did'nt you burn it?? its off me it aint gonna be a dodgy ISO
i gave you the XP pro no activation ISO why did'nt you burn it?? its off me it aint gonna be a dodgy ISO
"Instant Asshole: Just Add Alcohol"
- Freezmizer
- Know-It-All
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 8:54 am
I did burn it and a friend of mine installed it on her puter, works great. I just dont have a real need to switch yet because my copy of XP Home is "legit" and hasn't caused me any problems. But if I see any things about XP Pro I may consider changing over.
-- Ha Ha Charade you are....... --
- Boozybaz
- Alcoholic
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 2:41 pm
- Location: Staffordshire, England
- Contact:
***** man just row the boat out and take a chance, you aint gonna know whats different till you try pro are you??
make sure you "upgrade" and not "fresh installation"
make sure you "upgrade" and not "fresh installation"
"Instant Asshole: Just Add Alcohol"
I've used:
3.31
95
97 Alpha
98
NT
2000 Pro
ME
XP Home
XP Pro
My Dad worked for Microsoft, so I had access to a various releases of the different versions.
3.31: Good for it's time. It's time is past.
95: A leap forward in GUI, but buggy.
97 Alpha: Looked like 97, more bugs. So buggy that the final release was renamed Win98.
98: Still basically looks like 95, but improvements in performance.
NT: Still the same interface. Was good for network use.
2000 Pro: Yup, same interface. Great OS for computers with less than 800Mhz.
ME: A newer feel, but missing some functions I like. A bit unstable.
XP Home: The new look. Major drawback, all the security measures can be bypassed.
XP Pro: Best version of Windows released to date, if your computer is good enough to run it.
3.31
95
97 Alpha
98
NT
2000 Pro
ME
XP Home
XP Pro
My Dad worked for Microsoft, so I had access to a various releases of the different versions.
3.31: Good for it's time. It's time is past.
95: A leap forward in GUI, but buggy.
97 Alpha: Looked like 97, more bugs. So buggy that the final release was renamed Win98.
98: Still basically looks like 95, but improvements in performance.
NT: Still the same interface. Was good for network use.
2000 Pro: Yup, same interface. Great OS for computers with less than 800Mhz.
ME: A newer feel, but missing some functions I like. A bit unstable.
XP Home: The new look. Major drawback, all the security measures can be bypassed.
XP Pro: Best version of Windows released to date, if your computer is good enough to run it.
Well....from the begining
Some early form of basic (Vic20)
Amstrad Locomotive Basic & CPM
Dos 3
Dos 3.2
Dos 3.3/Gem GUI
Dos 5/Win 3.1
Dos 6/Win3.1
Dos 6.22/Win3.11
Win95
Win95 OSR2
Win98
Win98SE
WinME
Win2k <- I'm still happy with this in 2004, my pc runs for weeks at a time
I did try Windows 2.0 but my PC at the time couldn't handle it. I've also fiddled with various flavours of Linux.
Some early form of basic (Vic20)
Amstrad Locomotive Basic & CPM
Dos 3
Dos 3.2
Dos 3.3/Gem GUI
Dos 5/Win 3.1
Dos 6/Win3.1
Dos 6.22/Win3.11
Win95
Win95 OSR2
Win98
Win98SE
WinME
Win2k <- I'm still happy with this in 2004, my pc runs for weeks at a time
I did try Windows 2.0 but my PC at the time couldn't handle it. I've also fiddled with various flavours of Linux.
Yeah I'm showing my age. Got hooked on computers when the first home computers appeared.Boozybaz wrote:thats alot man
A friend showed me his, he typed :-
10 Print "Hello"
20 goto 10
Then he typed 'run' and the screen filled with hello's. I was amazed that 2 simple lines did that. I went and bought my first computer next morning.
What OS was that?Katcha wrote:Yeah I'm showing my age. Got hooked on computers when the first home computers appeared.Boozybaz wrote:thats alot man
A friend showed me his, he typed :-
10 Print "Hello"
20 goto 10
Then he typed 'run' and the screen filled with hello's. I was amazed that 2 simple lines did that. I went and bought my first computer next morning.
CricketMX.com in 2022: Still the home of bat's, rat's and other farmyard animals!
"OK, life [as you chose to define it] repeats until there are no more lessons to be learned." - nrnoble (June 12, 2005)
"the new forum looks awesome, it's getting bigger & better" - p2p-sharing-rules (11 Jan, 2008)
"Looks like CMX is not only getting bigger...but, also getting better!!" - moongirl (14 Dec, 2007)
"OK, life [as you chose to define it] repeats until there are no more lessons to be learned." - nrnoble (June 12, 2005)
"the new forum looks awesome, it's getting bigger & better" - p2p-sharing-rules (11 Jan, 2008)
"Looks like CMX is not only getting bigger...but, also getting better!!" - moongirl (14 Dec, 2007)
It's even earlier than DOS. QBASIC was a form of basic which runs on DOS.grinch2171 wrote:Those are DOS commands. QBASIC programming language.
The first home computers such as the Vic20 and the Spectrum all booted to a rom which ran BASIC. All the first programs on these were written in basic then they started getting better and used what was known as 'machine code' which still needed a 'BASIC loader' to prepare the computer to run the code. This was when the better games started appearing such as Manic Miner, Donkey Kong, Chuckie Egg etc. Some of the first games and apps took up to 10 minutes to load from magnetic tape and quite often needed to load the next level in from tape as the game progressed.
I remember typing lines and lines of basic listed in magazines into the computer to play a simple game, this was before 'cover cassettes' appeared. Of course it always failed at the first attempt which meant trawling the code for the errors (if you were lucky it told you the line number and type of error). Quite often it was a 'typo' in the magazine which meant trying to fix it yourself.
It was all great fun though, there was a sense of achievement when/if it finally ran.
Progs were fairly easy to copy though. If they were proteced I used apps called 'Scamp' and 'Tomcat' to copy them. If that failed a simple copy of the cassette on a dual deck tape player often did the trick.
BTW My Vic20 had a whopping 3 and a half kilobytes of ram available to use.